Build vs. buy, told in real numbers.
MyntriqOS reduces the cost of running a business function without transferring control of it to a vendor.
The gap shows up before the invoice does.
| Capability | Building it yourself | MyntriqOS |
|---|---|---|
| Tenant isolation | Enforced in application code, if at all | Enforced at the database layer by default |
| Delegated authority | Binary on/off permissions, built per feature | Three-mode spectrum, configured per action |
| Audit | Logs scattered across services | Immutable, exportable audit trail by default |
| Cross-functional context | Each tool sees only its own slice | Agents share governed context across functions |
| Knowledge retrieval | Bolted on per integration | Built in, versioned along with skills |
| Model dependence | Tied to whichever model you integrated first | Frontier, open-weight or local, chosen per workload |
Headline figures.
US$750k–US$1.15mil
Over three years, before ongoing maintenance.
US$120k–US$220k + licence
Over three years, governance and audit included.
See the full year-by-year breakdown in the whitepaper.
Ask before you sign, not after.
Strong, self-contained questions — worth putting to any vendor, including us.
Where does the data go, and who else touches it?
What happens when the agent is wrong — and can I prove what it did?
Can I cap what an agent may do, without a code change?
Am I paying for capability, or for lock-in to one model?
What is retained after I leave, and for how long?
Can I run this on infrastructure I control, or only on the vendor's?
Get the full cost model.
The whitepaper has the year-by-year breakdown behind these numbers.